BOSNIA STORM

AN BOSNIAN LETTER TO AMERICAN PEOPLE AND GOVERNMENT

Date: August 29, 1996.

It is a fact that the division of Bosnia, and the creation of new states within it, must be a formal legal process agreed to by the victim state itself. It is also a fact of international law that all individuals who declare themselves as loyal citizens of Bosnia (census 1991) are the only legitimate subjects who can legally sign for the termination of Bosnia in its constitutional form -- as it existed before the aggression, and as it has been recognized by the international community during 1992. Thus, approx. one thousand years of Bosnian statehood and continuity (in various forms) is about to be terminated with the Dayton documents and the upcoming travesty of justice named "elections", scheduled for September 14, 1996.

[ Reminder: For example, when Christopher Columbus made his voyage to the "New World", that is going to become known as America, Bosnian Dukedom and (later) Kingdom already possessed almost 500 years of statehood on the continent of Europe – twice as long as the USA today. Having stated that, we shall use this opportunity to thank the American People for their support – which provided a sharp contrast to the covert (and overt) activities of their Administration.]

The Western powers, whose general interests are much more important than Bosnia, Croatia and Serbia put together, respect in form the last legitimate Constitution of Bosnia so that various groups can vote on the future of the country. That is what is behind the actions of Western diplomacy today. The terms they use: "entities in Bosnia", "peace", "economic help", etc., are simply part of the information blockade imposed on the victim state, a state expected to sign its own death sentence, a state that is about to terminate its future in the September elections. That is about to happen after four years of the use of force against the state and its citizens. Terms like "peace", "economy", etc., are not part of the true agenda of the elections. These verbal promises, together with the somewhat wider territory around Sarajevo, are given to Bosnian citizens in exchange for something much more important: the loyalty of Bosnian citizens to their Constitution. Ironically, this is but their signature to Karadjic's project as stated in Dayton's "legal" framework. [Note: Radovan Karadzic is internationally declared war criminal and perpetrator of genocide.]

US Administration Insisting on Karadjic's removal from power is simply a "snow job" -- a way for, not himself but his project, to become legal and exculpable of war crimes. Declarations of the UN, US delegates in Bosnia and European Community, that they intend to "punish acts of genocide", to "side with victims and uphold their legal rights", and to "bring the guilty before the court", are all contradictory to the true intentions of the Dayton project, which are "justification", "legalization" (via internationally valid, signed documents) of the Serb war goal, which is to build a state on the collective graves of innocent people, their victims. This contradiction between public declarations and the truth, is at the center of events in Bosnia.

SOME OF THE METHODS:

More importantly, those who uphold the Dayton documents now use various methods to prepare Bosnians for the big loss to come. Those methods include (but are not limited to) the following:

-- Building a statelet/ghetto called "Bosnia" based on terminology that is not legal (i.e., "entities") within the territory of a rendered Republic. Bosnians are expected to sign away their statehood that was once recognized by the West, in favor of "entities" that do not exist in any single UN document at all.

-- Letting the Serb Republic (formed by Dayton documents) exchange food, water, electricity and such, with Bosnia to obtain internationally valid papers legalizing its existence. This goal was clear in the Dayton documents and simply serves to blockade and blackmail Sarajevo (as a capital with a Parliament, media and a University) so as to exchange the statehood papers of the Republic for the aforementioned (basic human survival) commodities. -- Providing for the illegal "facts on the ground" to become the facts of law. Now NATO and the US Administration of Bill Clinton give the "Bosnian Serbs" that which Karadjic/Mladic/Milosevic failed to do in Bosnia after facing a resistance sufficient enough for Bosnia to survive. That resistance was NOT foreseen by the planners of the genocide. The rashly formed Bosnian Army – disciplined, civilized, multi-ethnic, efficient -- became a dangerous negation to the expected "Yugoslav Army victory against an amorphous unarmed mass of Muslims". [ Note: heads of muslims and virtue of (raped) muslim women and children are very cheap on the international geostrategic market, anyway.]

[ Note: It is also deliberately disregarded by "the West" that there were hundreds of thousands of Bosnian Serbs (and Croats) loyal to the civic Republic and its legitimate government at the outset of the aggression. However, only followers of Serb ultra-nationalistic leaders are mentioned and called summarily the "Bosnian Serbs".] -- Neutralizing the Constitution of the victim state by negotiating with it instead of confronting the aggression. The aggression, together with war crimes, was supposed to be judged in front of the World Court, the proper place for international disagreements. But this course of action was avoided by: a) redefining aggression to a "civil war"; b) redefining the Bosnian government to a "Muslim government"; c) redefining the Bosnian Army to a "Muslim Army";

Boutros Boutros Ghali's UN aided in this sidestepping by redefining a political and legal problem of war/genocide as a "humanitarian problem", and so illegally EXCLUDED BOSNIA (the UN member state) FROM THE POLITICAL AND LEGAL PROTECTION OF THE UN CHARTER. [Note: Amongst other acts of war against a UN member state, the UN/NATO held a totally illegitimate and immoral arms embargo against the army and police (even the firefighters!) of the UN member state for the entire duration of mass murder of its loyal citizens. Four years (1992-1996) of the UN/NATO sea-air-land blockade of the Bosnian Army and Police Force is an act of war by basic textbook teachings of any military academy – by definition and by default. ]

-- Separating the war crime trials from the political problems the war poses is a strategy that can be viewed as the "inefficiency of the international community". However, this diversion only boosts Gen. Mladic and Karadjic's morale, both of whom talk about the sovereignty of the Serb Republic. This is a clear sign of outside support and the true meaning of the Dayton documents. Rhetoric about how the "important parts" of the Dayton documents are being adhered to, such as how NATO troops are on guard inside (not outside!) Bosnia's borders, is meant to show how the project is a success. Meanwhile, the return of refugees to their homes has become the least important part of the agreement. Every agreement should be considered null and void, if any part of it is not completed/realized. -- Blocking from any action and free speech all the critics who might notice that NATO, UN, OSCE, Richard Holbrook, Warren Christopher, Karl Bildt, and the US Administration in fact are NOT inefficient but EFFICIENT in their completion of a job. This gag order is in direct alliance with the Greater Serbia and Greater Croatia project. Such "inefficiency" silences the opposition parties, legal action of the Bosnian High Court in Sarajevo, prevents return of refugees to their homes, chokes the freedom of press/speech, puts surviving population in despair, etc.

-- Confronting questions having to do with the defense of the (one and the only legitimate) Constitution of 1974/1991 with answers from the Dayton documents. This is done regardless of the fact that all "peace" agreements, including the Dayton documents, are irrelevant constitutional topics. Bosnians will end up accepting the Dayton documents (and its even more eroded form) as a substitution for their last (and the only) legal Constitution due to this "exchange of constitutions" that salesman Holbrook sold to the American People as a "peace agreement".

-- Hiding the fact that the subject of Dayton talks (held behind closed doors) was Bosnia's Constitution, by calling it a "peace agreement" even though it formally establishes two new states (and their constitutions). [Note: Legislative, Judicial and Executive powers on a given territory make for a state and not an "entity". The term "entity" is from the Dayton document.]. Also, the Dayton documents that outline a Presidency and Parliament in UNION of states have not much in common with legitimate institutions of any state; at best, UNION is NOT a state but only UNION of states. The way this UNION is formulated in Dayton, and further redefined during 1996 (to the detriment of Bosnians), does not make this UNION anything more than a vehicle, a tool, a temporary legalistic step, towards "legitimate" destruction of the Republic and its citizens. It is actually a prelude to the formation and international recognition of Greater Serbia and Greater Croatia. De facto it is already so – we are now only helplessly observing motions to make it also a de jure "new reality". -- Hiding the fact that these elections are more than the voting they are proclaimed to be. According to the Dayton documents, these elections are a plebiscite and referendum favoring the Dayton "constitution" vs. the one and the only legitimate Constitution. So defined elections cannot be the subject of a peace agreement. These elections are also a plebiscite that will neutralize the internationally sponsored, monitored and approved March 1, 1992 plebiscite. After the March 1, 1992 vote, the formal recognition of the Republic became obligatory even for Russia and Greece. Later on, Russia and Greece were described to the American People as the "Serb allies who must be respected" in a campaign to reject the Bosnians’ desperate pleas for a permission to defend themselves against the perpetrators of the genocide ("Lift the arms embargo!"). -- Influencing election results by forcing all parties in the election campaign to comply with the demands of the Dayton documents -- the new Dayton "constitution" that has yet to be voted on. OSCE also violates Bosnian election laws by judging the behavior of Bosnian political parties; OSCE makes those interventions not in accordance with the actual Constitution but with Dayton's constitutional demands, -- again a code that has yet to be voted on (and therefore, in terms of law, powerless). -- The OSCE and other international political structures behind this body (though the OSCE should be the only mediator) are dictating all elements and terms of the election campaign favoring those parties already supporting the division of Bosnia. The recent OSCE complaint, in which the OSCE is only "protesting" against the violation of refugees' rights to free movement, also contains strict proposals that harm opposition parties which are clearly supporting an integral Bosnia. On August 26th, the OSCE published a list of hundreds of opposition candidates who are NOT allowed to be included on the ballots because, according to the OSCE, "they failed to prove that they were citizens of Bosnia back in 1991". Among those banned was Dr. Ivo Komsic - a Croat member of the Bosnian seven member Presidency (!); Bogic Bogicevic -- a Bosnian Serb representative of Bosnia in the Yugoslav presidency; Professor Dr. Zlatko Lagumdjija – Deputy Prime Minister at the beginning of the war, etc. These politicians, democratically elected officials (1990 elections!), are serious opponents of ethnic division and are leaders of major political parties. With a coalition, those opposition parties are threatening to defeat Izetbegovic and dismantle the idea that ethnic territories can become states within Bosnia, or that three sovereign peoples (fully protected by the legitimate Bosnian Constitution) can form sovereign states through the use of genocide.

Discussion about the mentioned scheming methods is unpopular and not so readily acceptable only if one is unaware of, or has forgotten, the efforts of the UN and EU to redefine all elements of the Bosnian war over the last five years. There is no space or time here for a thorough elaboration, but let us remind you of some of their methods and concepts. That reminder will enable observers to expect Bosnians to vote for Karadjic's Plan: -- Bosnia was recognized not out of love for Bosnia or Bosnians but out of necessity, considering that the recognition of independence of the states that constituted the Yugoslav federation (SFRY) was legitimate, since Yugoslavia consisted of six states (six different constitutions and parliaments). For Bosnia to be divided, Tudjman and Milosevic required that three "entities" be FABRICATED inside Bosnia in order to justify the legality of its internal division. They intended to make it as legal as in case of Yugoslavia. Thus, Milosevic created the Serb Republic and Tudjman created the Herzeg-Bosnia Croatian para-state. -- It was known that amongst the Bosnians there was one man who, if supported, could supply the necessary signatures for that plan. Alija Izetbegovic was that man. After being propped up to the highest position in the Republic (1990), indeed, he commenced working on that assignment. He gave four major signatures countering the Bosnian Constitution that he was sworn in to uphold. His major international signatures towards that unconstitutional and destructive goal were:

Lisbon 1992, Geneva 1993, Washington 1994, Dayton 1995.

In order to cover up his tracks, Izetbegovic was and still is, always misinterpreting those signatures after coming back to the Bosnian capital Sarajevo. The first three times , Parliament refused those signatures -- but accepted the last one (on the Contact Group first draft in 1994) after Izetbegovic promised that it was only a formal acceptance. Izetbegovic stated: "the Serb side would refuse it anyway". Outside Bosnia, Izetbegovic meanwhile campaigned with world leaders to force the Serbs to accept that the Contact Group plan (which called for a 49:51 % territorial division of Bosnia-Herzegovina). As the time passed, the Serb "war machine" proved itself to be a "war crime machine" – Izetbegovic's policy came in jeopardy. The turning point came when Serb General Mladic started to lose the war with Bosnia and Croatia on a much larger scale than was acceptable for the European strategists for "Serbia's leading role in the Balkans". In addition to that, the Bosnian Army 5th Corps defended Bihac. The "UN Safe Haven" of Bihac did not fall, contrary to William Perry's statement in late 1994. Bosnia did not lose the ground war, although the sponsors of Greater Serbia, such as British Foreign Minister Douglas Hurd, proclaimed them victors and used that false proclamation as an argument for why Bosnia must accept ethnic divisions. And it became clear that the "facts on the ground" were soon going to lead to a much smaller Serbia than was acceptable for the major Greater Serbia sponsors, UK and France. During 1995 it was clear that after (Croatian leader) Tudjman's military disaster in central Bosnia (1993/early 1994), the opening of a new front against Bosnia once again was out of the question. [ Reminder: The First time it was done from late 1992, throughout 1993 up to early 1994 by Tudjman.] In 1995 Croatia got a new role: After Bihac's Bosnian Army 5th Corps defeated Croatian Serbs in Krajina, it was Croatia (not Bosnia) that got the mandate (and arms) by the USA to "win the war" in the Krajina. The cold military fact is that the only fighting in the Krajina region during the four years (1992-1995) was done by the Bihac enclave defenders, the Bosnian Army 5th Corps, against the Croatian and Bosnian Serbs. Arming muslims with Iranian supplies was in fact arming Croatia – as the US Administration declared Croatia to be the "new authority in the region". Even before that declaration was made, Tudjman's "some criminals" in Herzegovina controlled weapons transferred to the Bosnian Army. In return for those military supplies, as well as food and medicaments for its population, Bosnia was giving up its statehood to the Greater Croatia project. That Croatian "marvelous victory" in Krajina (summer 1995) was the first totally visible open partnership of the Clinton’s Administration with the Croatian ultra-nationalist leader Franjo Tudjman. Everything about Croatia and Serbia's exchange of suspicious "victories" and territories would have been just fine if the truly victorious 5th and 7th Corps of the Bosnian Army in West Bosnia were hindered from pushing the Serbs too far from the Mt. Vlasic and Mt. Grmec early in 1995. Those Bosnian masterful victories upset the advocates of a divided Bosnia in the UK, France and Germany (yes, Klaus Kinkel, German Foreign minister, is the father of the UNION Contact group plan, today also known as the Dayton Plan). The Bosnian victories led to panic in european capitals, and a demand was launched to the US to "do something in Bosnia". That phrase, "to do something in Bosnia", was also popular among the majority of American People. However, the American People had something noble in mind: they wanted US Administration to do something FOR Bosnia, not AGAINST Bosnia (as signaled from the european capitals). Indeed, there was a very real possibility that the US Congress could lift the arms embargo. Lo and behold, the Clinton Administration (already having switched to the British plan for Bosnia during 1993) turned against the US Congress and the People by doing the wrong (totally opposite) "something" in Bosnia. In order to undermine the already voted-on Congress decision for lifting of the arms embargo, the Clinton Administration performed a military exercise (a la British UN General Michael Rose: with no casualties to Mladic's infantry) selecting some "infrastructure objects" for bombardment.

The true goal of that military exercise (a.k.a. NATO pin prick air strikes, summer of 1995) was this: the Bosnian Parliament, Army and the People would be required to accept Izetbegovic's plan, a plan that the USA ("Bosnia's friend") would guarantee. The "American friendship" was finally "proven" by the "bombardment" of dozen or so of Gen. Mladic's warehouses and several abandoned WW II tanks. Now, "obliged" by that fiery display of "friendship", the Bosnians would be offered the papers, the Dayton documents, to sign on to the goal that Serb Gen. Mladic's troops spent four years killing (unarmed) people: recognition of the Serb Republic.

However, this concept of US "friendship" to Bosnians had its side effects: When the Bosnian Army (a rashly created citizen army formed in 1992), even under severe handicap of arms embargo and its mere three years of existence, started to win back its territory, NATO took these victories away from them and gave the land back to the Serbs with the Dayton documents. Bosnians and the international public were given some propaganda rhetoric about how "NATO stopped atrocities in Bosnia". The truth is, of course, that the NATO in fact stopped the Bosnian Army's liberation drive before the American public could pay more attention to fact that the "invincible Serbs" were loosing three towns a day. NATO's action was promoted by the US Administration propaganda campaign as a "punishment of the Serbs because of genocide in Srebrenica". [ Note: Srebrenica massacre was a July 1995 mass murder of up to 10 000 unarmed Bosnian men, women and children in the "UN safe haven of Srebrenica" in only a few days.] The massacre of the Bosnians in the Srebrenica "UN protected" enclave had been declared as "new opportunity for peace" by Bill Clinton himself. Not many people understood the true meaning of Bill Clinton’s words. What he actually meant, is that the Srebrenica slaughter simplified the "ethnically pure" map of Bosnia, and thus made its rendering even more achievable. Clinton: "massacre is an opportunity for peace" – George Orwell Newspeak: "War is peace".

The pin prick NATO air strikes were thus used as a "proof positive" that the Clinton Administration was "doing something" FOR Bosnia, and not AGAINST Bosnia. As one can easily see, that is not so – au countraire -- after seeing footage of "Operation Bosnia Storm", people stopped asking for the embargo on Bosnians to be lifted. So while Karadjic can easily rebuild lost warehouses, Bosnians are ordered to give up something that cannot be rebuilt with money: their Constitution/Statehood, and their FUTURE. NATO never really stopped murder of civilians in any "UN safe haven". So for Bosnians to give up all in exchange for NATO's "stopping" of the Serb military "superpower" from killing civilians in "UN safe havens", is not a deal – it is a travesty of justice.

This description of how the Bosnian "representatives" Izetbegovic-Silajdjic-Sacirbey came about to sign the suicidal Dayton Plan and agree to the upcoming elections would be not so obvious if another phenomenon was not considered: What one Izetbegovic and his small group of quasi-islamic agnostics (a.k.a. British islamists - fighters against racionalism in muslim societies ) is able to do if supported from the outside. Known as fighter against the theory of state itself Izetbegovic was extracted from Bosnia state prison after strong political activity led by Radovan Karadjic, Nikola Koljevic Mihajlo Markovic, all members or honorable members of British Royal Institute for Strategic Studies knowwn as Tevistock Institute. Izetbegovic is in war against the Bosnian state -- a state that imprisoned him once in 1983 and sentenced him to 14 years of prison for activities against the Bosnian statehood. If justice was served, he would have been out of jail in 1997; but, the Serbian chauvinist movement set him free only several years into his prison term. His real role in Bosnia has been explained to Europian governments by Bilderberg society members ( Lord Owen and Torwald stoltenberg) and to US Administration by leaders of Trilateral Commision like Henry Kisinger and other "experts" for keeping muslims far from Parlaments and close to mosks (destiny). On the other side in the fight for Bosnia there is only the (theory of) International law, Bosnian Constitution and uninformed Bosnian people as its sole defenders.

The majority of people like to believe that the LAW is NOT so important in Bosnia's case. One could think that such an approach is right since the great world powers are making decisions as they see fit; however, it is very important to point out that it is just the opposite. Izetbegovic is the man controlling things since he knows that the various powers know that he is the only one who can solve their problems (to division of Bosnia to be legal (permanent) and killing of Bosnians to look unavoidable and Strong and grate Serbia Serbia to look as necesity. Like this political groups Izetbegovic even used Serb grenades as an argument in the negotiations with the loyal citizens, against the Bosnian Constitution. He was only one alowed togo out of seage and like Henry Kisinger to redefine the war against mainly secular civilians as the "religious or ethnic war.

With Bosnian University and media under blockade a few people see how absurd it is that Izetbegovic can negotiate something that is non-negotiable under the pressure of the agression and law of the same Constitution. He made it possible by accepting negotiations ("out of UN Charter settlements") instead of court (UN Charter) procedure to challenge the aggressor; his strategy made all of Bosnia a totally NEGOTIABLE subject -- even the lives of its people. Only President Izetbegovic could collaborate with the enemies. Officially, Serbia lost this war, the USA saved and today is sawing "Communist" ruler of Serbia, Slobodan Milosevic (a.k.a. "Butcher of the Balkans"), so Izetbegovic is the only card left needed to make a Greater Serbia and Greater Croatia. In return for his services, he is asking the foreigners to bear part of the responsibility, and the blame, if they want everything with the Bosnian people to work fine and his "muslim image" to function untarnished. This agnostic is the most protected and safe "muslim" in a NATO-controlled part of the world today. Only the dedicated experts, the ones who are in a position to make a day-to-day analysis of Izetbegovic's moves, can see the irony of a leader fighting against a constitution he is sworn to uphold. Such a job could not be done better even by Holbrook. Holbrook was only the last one in a series of dozens of mediators to make a career success of providing for Izetbegovic's signatures for the division of Bosnia. The only one who was impatient and sold the "care argument" was Warren Christopher when in January 1995, during the Bihac Crisis, he gave away the secret to Congressmen in order to stop them from voting to lift the arms embargo. He was angry at the Congress because he had to reveal to them that "the government of Bosnia [was] closely cooperating on division of that country". Now there is more and more evidence about how Izetbegovic (an anti-state apologet and pseudo-philosopher) came from the Bosnian state prison in Zenica to become not less than a President of the country. The possibility of publication of that story by Karadjic is probably one of the reasons why nobody will be eager to bring Karadzic to The Hague. Even then, Karadjic would probably not denounce Izetbegovic because Izetbegovic is still needed for the transformation of the Bosnians, from citizens to an amorphous agnostic religious mass that can make Croatia's leading role in the B-H Federation easier. So far, it is known that he was visited by British intelligence officers in prison twice just before his release in 1988, a release that was provided by the predominately Serb police with close ties with British intelligence. Professor of Marxism on Sarajevo University during 1980’s, Vojislav Seselj, has become infamous during the 1990’s as the leader of one of the most blood-thirsty Serb militias in Bosnia (named after him "Seseljevci"). He is the leader and his cohorts are the members of the Serbian Radical Party. Yes, that same Professor of Marxism Vojislav Seselj was petitioning and fighting for Izetbegovic's release after Bosnian leadership jailed Izetbegovic and his narrow group in his dedication to release Izetbegovic, Seselj made himself many enemies amongst the Bosnian patriots, Bosnian intelligentsia of the Sarajevo cultural and political scene – so they actually made him leave Sarajevo during the 1980’s mostly due to that kind of confrontation.

Doctor of Psychiatry Radovan Karadjic promised a nationwide Bosnian TV audience in 1991 that there would be no war if Bosnians voted for Izetbegovic instead of social-democrats, republicans, and others.

Immediately after coming to power, Izetbegovic violated Bosnia's civil constitution establishing a coalition with Karadjic's (SDS) extremist and Croatian ultra-nationalist (HDZ) parties. He signed the Lisbon ethnic canonization of Bosnia in February 1992, but Parliament refused it. However, the papers to the land were already given to Greater Serbia and only remaining problem that was left to take care of were the live (but uninformed) people who were living on that land. Soon genocide in East Bosnia commenced -- all towns and villages that were slaughtered the most, were the ones where Izetbegovic won the elections and had power to order the infamous local negotiations over the imaginary "muslim" and "Serb" parts of those towns (a medieval Feudal model of township). For this war, Karadjic and Boban have had Izetbegovic's signatures for the exchange of 70% of Bosnian territory. Only the unarmed civilians were the obstacle to that "brilliant opportunity" for Serbia. Such is the definition of genocide in Bosnia: OBSTACLES WERE OVERCOME.

Today, Izetbegovic is a wild card in these last days of Bosnia. For example, it is not true that Croatian para-state "Herzeg-Bosnia" was terminated with his recent agreement with Tudjman because "Herzeg-Bosnia" never really even existed in any international legal form. On the other hand, by that agreement, Tudjman succeeded in getting what he could not get by war in 1993 -- to have Bosnia voluntarily give up its sovereignty even before the September elections required by the Dayton accord. Tudjman-Izetbegovic most recent deal is that the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina is to be terminated on August 31, 1996. Finally, that signature was provided when the USA came to the scene as the guarantor for Bosnia's future while using those terms that established the separation of "Muslim-Croat federation" and the Serb Republic. In the Dayton agreement the Bosnians got an "entity"??? and Karadjic's Serbs got a state by definition – something that they never had in history of Bosnia-Herzegovina, nor could get by war or war crimes even if they won the war. The fact that Karadjic was removed from office is also crucial in his plan for the division of the Republic TO BECOME LEGAL AND PERMANENT.

This is plainly the termination of Bosnia and the birth of a new state, the Serb Republic. If we look at the UN charter, it stipulates that if a state under war wishes to exist (the Serb Republic is planning to be a permanent state under the protection of the UN Charter), it can do so only if the victim (here, the Bosnians) withdraw their rights to be sovereign citizens on the entire territory of Bosnia-Herzegovina, and accept new sovereignties in place of the old. The usual propaganda story is the building up of a "potential islamic danger" in Bosnia. If the Bosnians prove themselves to be civic, more into statehood and more clever than Gnostics, that the "mujahideen" can be invented (or invited) to help Warren Christopher push back Bosnians from their political fight for defense of their statehood and into a state of religious autonomy. For this ugly project of building Karadjic's Serbia, in Bosnia Izetbegovic’s role is crucial. He is extracted from prison Civil and integral Bosnia to become "muslim leader" of a "muslim government" of a "Small Bosnia Entity" on torn apart, nonfunctional swatches of land that occupy approx. 22-24% of its total territory. This degradation of Bosnians from a status of sovereign citizens to a "wandering tribe" is also one of the goals Karadjic was fighting and killing for – so that his graveyard state becomes recognized by his victims.

Many Bosnians did not want to accept "muslim entity" and identity without statehood in Bosnia. More than 200 000 of them are now in collective graveyards in the Serb "entity". They died at their doorsteps because they, as real civilians, did not know nor did they believe that their President is giving their land and homes to Karadjic’s mountain tribesmen.

Though Karadjic is not formally now in power, the US Administration is now running his model plan for the division of Bosnia in an efficient way since Izetbegovic still remains in power. As long as US troops are on Borders of Republic Serpska, and not Bosnian borders Karadjic does not really need to be present – everything is taken care of by NATO , no problem. It is clear that they want to push Karadjic out of office while concurrently protecting themselves from the consequences of passive collaboration with his goals. All to protect Karadjic's project, and his aide de camp, Izetbegovic.

Nowadays there are some more manipulations and hand-twisting going on. Too many to mention. The cart of morality and law is rolling down hill: the genocide is being "legalized" and even made "legally respectable".

In 1992 Bosnian citizens tried to run away from the in London and Belgrade proscribed "muslim" destiny by the vehicle of their constitutionally enshrined parliamentary republic. They did not know that their place is in muslim stereotype regardles there is no oil in Bosnia. Lo and behold, the UN, the EU and the US Administration made sure that they pay for it dearly.